Cleaning up Your Computer From: David Neeley First, there is a question with the latest computers about whether defragmentation makes much difference on the newest, fastest hard drives. That said, most of us don't *have* the newest, fastest hard drives! Defragmentation is the process of collecting all the various parts of computer data files together, so the bits and bytes are all sequential or "contiguous." That way, when the read/write heads locate the beginning of a file they waste no time and incur no extra wear in zig-zagging around the disk to move from part to part as they must do for fragmented files. But that's not all there is to it! The "smarter" defragmentation programs determine what files are accessed most often, and put them in the first sectors of the disk (on the outside tracks, in fact, because more data goes under the heads with a given amount of rotation). Some schemes locate the executable files including the operating system's critical parts and frequently used applications up front, too, because the computer accesses these extremely frequently. Microsoft normally licenses very basic utilities such as this from other vendors. I am not sure about their current defragmentation utilities, but for many years they licensed an extremely basic one from Symantec. Obviously, people making and selling more specialized tools try to build in enough abilities to make it worth the customer's while to buy the separate utility. Also, please note that most Windows 2000 and XP computers use a different file system from Windows 98 and ME. They work somewhat differently, but the general principles I have discussed are still applicable. However, one problem that many regular defragmentation utilities do not do at all--or, in other cases, may not do well--is to defragment specific items that can cause severe performance problems...such as the Registry "hives" (which my first post spoke about) and several other kinds of files that are often not touched by traditional resources. This is why the "registry defrag" tools are often needed in addition to the more well-known defragmentation utilities. Normally, when working on a client's system or one of my own, I do the conventional defragmentation first, then follow with a thorough defrag of the Registry and the other system files that were not done with the first process. Hard disks have become so fast and so densely packed with information that the jumping around of the disk heads is less of a problem than it was previously...at least for the data files. Recent tests on some of these drives, as I mentioned in the beginning, say that defragmentation of data and executable files may not be a serious problem for these disks. However, I think it is accurate to say that Registry problems are still with us--and, with all the programs folks are using today, may even be growing worse than in the past. All of which is why when I can I use one of my Linux machines! Much faster and less problem-prone than Windows. The Mac OSX machines are also lovely, by the way. For now, if you have the Norton Utilities that include "Speed Disk" or another third-party defragmenter, use it. Otherwise, use the built-in tool included with Windows for the file defragmentation and follow with one of the registry defragmentation tools I mentioned before that are free for the "finishing touch." David is an active FFL member.